Title: | Estimation of Model-Based Predictions, Contrasts and Means |
---|---|
Description: | Implements a general interface for model-based estimations for a wide variety of models, used in the computation of marginal means, contrast analysis and predictions. For a list of supported models, see 'insight::supported_models()'. |
Authors: | Dominique Makowski [aut, cre] , Daniel Lüdecke [aut] , Mattan S. Ben-Shachar [aut] , Indrajeet Patil [aut] |
Maintainer: | Dominique Makowski <[email protected]> |
License: | GPL-3 |
Version: | 0.8.9.35 |
Built: | 2025-01-18 01:16:22 UTC |
Source: | https://github.com/easystats/modelbased |
This function summarises the smooth term trend in terms of linear segments. Using the approximate derivative, it separates a non-linear vector into quasi-linear segments (in which the trend is either positive or negative). Each of this segment its characterized by its beginning, end, size (in proportion, relative to the total size) trend (the linear regression coefficient) and linearity (the R2 of the linear regression).
describe_nonlinear(data, ...) ## S3 method for class 'data.frame' describe_nonlinear(data, x = NULL, y = NULL, ...) estimate_smooth(data, ...)
describe_nonlinear(data, ...) ## S3 method for class 'data.frame' describe_nonlinear(data, x = NULL, y = NULL, ...) estimate_smooth(data, ...)
data |
The data containing the link, as for instance obtained by
|
... |
Other arguments to be passed to or from. |
x , y
|
The name of the responses variable ( |
A data frame of linear description of non-linear terms.
# Create data data <- data.frame(x = rnorm(200)) data$y <- data$x^2 + rnorm(200, 0, 0.5) model <<- lm(y ~ poly(x, 2), data = data) link_data <- estimate_relation(model, length = 100) describe_nonlinear(link_data, x = "x")
# Create data data <- data.frame(x = rnorm(200)) data$y <- data$x^2 + rnorm(200, 0, 0.5) model <<- lm(y ~ poly(x, 2), data = data) link_data <- estimate_relation(model, length = 100) describe_nonlinear(link_data, x = "x")
Run a contrast analysis by estimating the differences between each level of a
factor. See also other related functions such as estimate_means()
and estimate_slopes()
.
estimate_contrasts( model, contrast = NULL, by = NULL, predict = NULL, ci = 0.95, p_adjust = "none", comparison = "pairwise", marginalize = "average", backend = getOption("modelbased_backend", "emmeans"), transform = NULL, verbose = TRUE, ... )
estimate_contrasts( model, contrast = NULL, by = NULL, predict = NULL, ci = 0.95, p_adjust = "none", comparison = "pairwise", marginalize = "average", backend = getOption("modelbased_backend", "emmeans"), transform = NULL, verbose = TRUE, ... )
model |
A statistical model. |
contrast |
A character vector indicating the name of the variable(s) for which to compute the contrasts. |
by |
The (focal) predictor variable(s) at which to evaluate the desired
effect / mean / contrasts. Other predictors of the model that are not
included here will be collapsed and "averaged" over (the effect will be
estimated across them). |
predict |
Is passed to the
|
ci |
Confidence Interval (CI) level. Default to |
p_adjust |
The p-values adjustment method for frequentist multiple
comparisons. Can be one of |
comparison |
Specify the type of contrasts or tests that should be carried out.
|
marginalize |
Character string, indicating the type of marginalization.
This dictates how the predictions are "averaged" over the non-focal predictors,
i.e. those variables that are not specified in
In other words, the distinction between marginalization types resides in whether the prediction are made for:
|
backend |
Whether to use You can set a default backend via |
transform |
Deprecated, please use |
verbose |
Use |
... |
Other arguments passed, for instance, to
|
The estimate_slopes()
, estimate_means()
and estimate_contrasts()
functions are forming a group, as they are all based on marginal
estimations (estimations based on a model). All three are built on the
emmeans or marginaleffects package (depending on the backend
argument), so reading its documentation (for instance emmeans::emmeans()
,
emmeans::emtrends()
or this website) is
recommended to understand the idea behind these types of procedures.
Model-based predictions is the basis for all that follows. Indeed,
the first thing to understand is how models can be used to make predictions
(see estimate_link()
). This corresponds to the predicted response (or
"outcome variable") given specific predictor values of the predictors (i.e.,
given a specific data configuration). This is why the concept of reference grid()
is so important for direct predictions.
Marginal "means", obtained via estimate_means()
, are an extension
of such predictions, allowing to "average" (collapse) some of the predictors,
to obtain the average response value at a specific predictors configuration.
This is typically used when some of the predictors of interest are factors.
Indeed, the parameters of the model will usually give you the intercept value
and then the "effect" of each factor level (how different it is from the
intercept). Marginal means can be used to directly give you the mean value of
the response variable at all the levels of a factor. Moreover, it can also be
used to control, or average over predictors, which is useful in the case of
multiple predictors with or without interactions.
Marginal contrasts, obtained via estimate_contrasts()
, are
themselves at extension of marginal means, in that they allow to investigate
the difference (i.e., the contrast) between the marginal means. This is,
again, often used to get all pairwise differences between all levels of a
factor. It works also for continuous predictors, for instance one could also
be interested in whether the difference at two extremes of a continuous
predictor is significant.
Finally, marginal effects, obtained via estimate_slopes()
, are
different in that their focus is not values on the response variable, but the
model's parameters. The idea is to assess the effect of a predictor at a
specific configuration of the other predictors. This is relevant in the case
of interactions or non-linear relationships, when the effect of a predictor
variable changes depending on the other predictors. Moreover, these effects
can also be "averaged" over other predictors, to get for instance the
"general trend" of a predictor over different factor levels.
Example: Let's imagine the following model lm(y ~ condition * x)
where
condition
is a factor with 3 levels A, B and C and x
a continuous
variable (like age for example). One idea is to see how this model performs,
and compare the actual response y to the one predicted by the model (using
estimate_expectation()
). Another idea is evaluate the average mean at each of
the condition's levels (using estimate_means()
), which can be useful to
visualize them. Another possibility is to evaluate the difference between
these levels (using estimate_contrasts()
). Finally, one could also estimate
the effect of x averaged over all conditions, or instead within each
condition (using [estimate_slopes]
).
A data frame of estimated contrasts.
## Not run: # Basic usage model <- lm(Sepal.Width ~ Species, data = iris) estimate_contrasts(model) # Dealing with interactions model <- lm(Sepal.Width ~ Species * Petal.Width, data = iris) # By default: selects first factor estimate_contrasts(model) # Can also run contrasts between points of numeric estimate_contrasts(model, contrast = "Petal.Width", length = 4) # Or both estimate_contrasts(model, contrast = c("Species", "Petal.Width"), length = 2) # Or with custom specifications estimate_contrasts(model, contrast = c("Species", "Petal.Width=c(1, 2)")) # Or modulate it estimate_contrasts(model, by = "Petal.Width", length = 4) # Standardized differences estimated <- estimate_contrasts(lm(Sepal.Width ~ Species, data = iris)) standardize(estimated) # Other models (mixed, Bayesian, ...) data <- iris data$Petal.Length_factor <- ifelse(data$Petal.Length < 4.2, "A", "B") model <- lme4::lmer(Sepal.Width ~ Species + (1 | Petal.Length_factor), data = data) estimate_contrasts(model) data <- mtcars data$cyl <- as.factor(data$cyl) data$am <- as.factor(data$am) model <- rstanarm::stan_glm(mpg ~ cyl * am, data = data, refresh = 0) estimate_contrasts(model) # fix `am` at value 1 estimate_contrasts(model, by = c("cyl", "am='1'")) model <- rstanarm::stan_glm(mpg ~ cyl * wt, data = data, refresh = 0) estimate_contrasts(model) estimate_contrasts(model, by = "wt", length = 4) model <- rstanarm::stan_glm( Sepal.Width ~ Species + Petal.Width + Petal.Length, data = iris, refresh = 0 ) estimate_contrasts(model, by = "Petal.Length", test = "bf") ## End(Not run)
## Not run: # Basic usage model <- lm(Sepal.Width ~ Species, data = iris) estimate_contrasts(model) # Dealing with interactions model <- lm(Sepal.Width ~ Species * Petal.Width, data = iris) # By default: selects first factor estimate_contrasts(model) # Can also run contrasts between points of numeric estimate_contrasts(model, contrast = "Petal.Width", length = 4) # Or both estimate_contrasts(model, contrast = c("Species", "Petal.Width"), length = 2) # Or with custom specifications estimate_contrasts(model, contrast = c("Species", "Petal.Width=c(1, 2)")) # Or modulate it estimate_contrasts(model, by = "Petal.Width", length = 4) # Standardized differences estimated <- estimate_contrasts(lm(Sepal.Width ~ Species, data = iris)) standardize(estimated) # Other models (mixed, Bayesian, ...) data <- iris data$Petal.Length_factor <- ifelse(data$Petal.Length < 4.2, "A", "B") model <- lme4::lmer(Sepal.Width ~ Species + (1 | Petal.Length_factor), data = data) estimate_contrasts(model) data <- mtcars data$cyl <- as.factor(data$cyl) data$am <- as.factor(data$am) model <- rstanarm::stan_glm(mpg ~ cyl * am, data = data, refresh = 0) estimate_contrasts(model) # fix `am` at value 1 estimate_contrasts(model, by = c("cyl", "am='1'")) model <- rstanarm::stan_glm(mpg ~ cyl * wt, data = data, refresh = 0) estimate_contrasts(model) estimate_contrasts(model, by = "wt", length = 4) model <- rstanarm::stan_glm( Sepal.Width ~ Species + Petal.Width + Petal.Length, data = iris, refresh = 0 ) estimate_contrasts(model, by = "Petal.Length", test = "bf") ## End(Not run)
After fitting a model, it is useful generate model-based estimates of the response variables for different combinations of predictor values. Such estimates can be used to make inferences about relationships between variables, to make predictions about individual cases, or to compare the predicted values against the observed data.
The modelbased
package includes 4 "related" functions, that mostly differ in
their default arguments (in particular, data
and predict
):
estimate_prediction(data = NULL, predict = "prediction", ...)
estimate_expectation(data = NULL, predict = "expectation", ...)
estimate_relation(data = "grid", predict = "expectation", ...)
estimate_link(data = "grid", predict = "link", ...)
While they are all based on model-based predictions (using insight::get_predicted()
),
they differ in terms of the type of predictions they make by default. For
instance, estimate_prediction
/estimate_expectation
return predictions for
the original data used to fit the model, while estimate_relation
/estimate_link
return predictions on a insight::get_datagrid()
. Similarly, estimate_link
returns predictions on the link scale, while the others return predictions on
the response scale. Note that the relevance of these differences depends on the
model family (for instance, for linear models, estimate_relation
is equivalent
to estimate_link
, since there is no difference between the link-scale and the
response scale).
Note that you can run plot()
on
the output of these functions to get some visual insights (see the
plotting examples).
See the details section below for details about the different possibilities.
estimate_expectation( model, data = NULL, by = NULL, predict = "expectation", ci = 0.95, keep_iterations = FALSE, ... ) estimate_link( model, data = "grid", by = NULL, predict = "link", ci = 0.95, keep_iterations = FALSE, ... ) estimate_prediction( model, data = NULL, by = NULL, predict = "prediction", ci = 0.95, keep_iterations = FALSE, ... ) estimate_relation( model, data = "grid", by = NULL, predict = "expectation", ci = 0.95, keep_iterations = FALSE, ... )
estimate_expectation( model, data = NULL, by = NULL, predict = "expectation", ci = 0.95, keep_iterations = FALSE, ... ) estimate_link( model, data = "grid", by = NULL, predict = "link", ci = 0.95, keep_iterations = FALSE, ... ) estimate_prediction( model, data = NULL, by = NULL, predict = "prediction", ci = 0.95, keep_iterations = FALSE, ... ) estimate_relation( model, data = "grid", by = NULL, predict = "expectation", ci = 0.95, keep_iterations = FALSE, ... )
model |
A statistical model. |
data |
A data frame with model's predictors to estimate the response. If
|
by |
The predictor variable(s) at which to estimate the response. Other
predictors of the model that are not included here will be set to their mean
value (for numeric predictors), reference level (for factors) or mode (other
types). The |
predict |
This parameter controls what is predicted (and gets internally
passed to |
ci |
Confidence Interval (CI) level. Default to |
keep_iterations |
If |
... |
You can add all the additional control arguments from
|
A data frame of predicted values and uncertainty intervals, with
class "estimate_predicted"
. Methods for visualisation_recipe()
and plot()
are available.
The most important way that various types of response estimates differ is in terms of what quantity is being estimated and the meaning of the uncertainty intervals. The major choices are expected values for uncertainty in the regression line and predicted values for uncertainty in the individual case predictions.
Expected values refer to the fitted regression line - the estimated average response value (i.e., the "expectation") for individuals with specific predictor values. For example, in a linear model y = 2 + 3x + 4z + e, the estimated average y for individuals with x = 1 and z = 2 is 11.
For expected values, uncertainty intervals refer to uncertainty in the estimated conditional average (where might the true regression line actually fall)? Uncertainty intervals for expected values are also called "confidence intervals".
Expected values and their uncertainty intervals are useful for describing the relationship between variables and for describing how precisely a model has been estimated.
For generalized linear models, expected values are reported on one of two scales:
The link scale refers to scale of the fitted regression line, after transformation by the link function. For example, for a logistic regression (logit binomial) model, the link scale gives expected log-odds. For a log-link Poisson model, the link scale gives the expected log-count.
The response scale refers to the original scale of the response variable (i.e., without any link function transformation). Expected values on the link scale are back-transformed to the original response variable metric (e.g., expected probabilities for binomial models, expected counts for Poisson models).
In contrast to expected values, predicted values refer to predictions for individual cases. Predicted values are also called "posterior predictions" or "posterior predictive draws".
For predicted values, uncertainty intervals refer to uncertainty in the individual response values for each case (where might any single case actually fall)? Uncertainty intervals for predicted values are also called "prediction intervals" or "posterior predictive intervals".
Predicted values and their uncertainty intervals are useful for forecasting the range of values that might be observed in new data, for making decisions about individual cases, and for checking if model predictions are reasonable ("posterior predictive checks").
Predicted values and intervals are always on the scale of the original response variable (not the link scale).
modelbased provides 4 functions for generating model-based response estimates and their uncertainty:
estimate_expectation()
:
Generates expected values (conditional average) on the response scale.
The uncertainty interval is a confidence interval.
By default, values are computed using the data used to fit the model.
estimate_link()
:
Generates expected values (conditional average) on the link scale.
The uncertainty interval is a confidence interval.
By default, values are computed using a reference grid spanning the
observed range of predictor values (see insight::get_datagrid()
).
estimate_prediction()
:
Generates predicted values (for individual cases) on the response scale.
The uncertainty interval is a prediction interval.
By default, values are computed using the data used to fit the model.
estimate_relation()
:
Like estimate_expectation()
.
Useful for visualizing a model.
Generates expected values (conditional average) on the response scale.
The uncertainty interval is a confidence interval.
By default, values are computed using a reference grid spanning the
observed range of predictor values (see insight::get_datagrid()
).
If the data = NULL
, values are estimated using the data used to fit the
model. If data = "grid"
, values are computed using a reference grid
spanning the observed range of predictor values with
insight::get_datagrid()
. This can be useful for model visualization. The
number of predictor values used for each variable can be controlled with the
length
argument. data
can also be a data frame containing columns with
names matching the model frame (see insight::get_data()
). This can be used
to generate model predictions for specific combinations of predictor values.
These functions are built on top of insight::get_predicted()
and correspond
to different specifications of its parameters. It may be useful to read its
documentation,
in particular the description of the predict
argument for additional
details on the difference between expected vs. predicted values and link vs.
response scales.
Additional control parameters can be used to control results from
insight::get_datagrid()
(when data = "grid"
) and from
insight::get_predicted()
(the function used internally to compute
predictions).
For plotting, check the examples in visualisation_recipe()
. Also check out
the Vignettes and README examples for
various examples, tutorials and usecases.
library(modelbased) # Linear Models model <- lm(mpg ~ wt, data = mtcars) # Get predicted and prediction interval (see insight::get_predicted) estimate_expectation(model) # Get expected values with confidence interval pred <- estimate_relation(model) pred # Visualisation (see visualisation_recipe()) plot(pred) # Standardize predictions pred <- estimate_relation(lm(mpg ~ wt + am, data = mtcars)) z <- standardize(pred, include_response = FALSE) z unstandardize(z, include_response = FALSE) # Logistic Models model <- glm(vs ~ wt, data = mtcars, family = "binomial") estimate_expectation(model) estimate_relation(model) # Mixed models model <- lme4::lmer(mpg ~ wt + (1 | gear), data = mtcars) estimate_expectation(model) estimate_relation(model) # Bayesian models model <- suppressWarnings(rstanarm::stan_glm( mpg ~ wt, data = mtcars, refresh = 0, iter = 200 )) estimate_expectation(model) estimate_relation(model)
library(modelbased) # Linear Models model <- lm(mpg ~ wt, data = mtcars) # Get predicted and prediction interval (see insight::get_predicted) estimate_expectation(model) # Get expected values with confidence interval pred <- estimate_relation(model) pred # Visualisation (see visualisation_recipe()) plot(pred) # Standardize predictions pred <- estimate_relation(lm(mpg ~ wt + am, data = mtcars)) z <- standardize(pred, include_response = FALSE) z unstandardize(z, include_response = FALSE) # Logistic Models model <- glm(vs ~ wt, data = mtcars, family = "binomial") estimate_expectation(model) estimate_relation(model) # Mixed models model <- lme4::lmer(mpg ~ wt + (1 | gear), data = mtcars) estimate_expectation(model) estimate_relation(model) # Bayesian models model <- suppressWarnings(rstanarm::stan_glm( mpg ~ wt, data = mtcars, refresh = 0, iter = 200 )) estimate_expectation(model) estimate_relation(model)
Extract random parameters of each individual group in the context of mixed models. Can be reshaped to be of the same dimensions as the original data, which can be useful to add the random effects to the original data.
estimate_grouplevel(model, type = "random", ...) reshape_grouplevel(x, indices = "all", group = "all", ...)
estimate_grouplevel(model, type = "random", ...) reshape_grouplevel(x, indices = "all", group = "all", ...)
model |
A mixed model with random effects. |
type |
If |
... |
Other arguments passed to or from other methods. |
x |
The output of |
indices |
A list containing the indices to extract (e.g., "Coefficient"). |
group |
A list containing the random factors to select. |
# lme4 model data(mtcars) model <- lme4::lmer(mpg ~ hp + (1 | carb), data = mtcars) random <- estimate_grouplevel(model) random # Visualize random effects plot(random) # Show group-specific effects estimate_grouplevel(model, deviation = FALSE) # Reshape to wide data so that it matches the original dataframe... reshaped <- reshape_grouplevel(random, indices = c("Coefficient", "SE")) # ... and can be easily combined alldata <- cbind(mtcars, reshaped) # Use summary() to remove duplicated rows summary(reshaped) # Compute BLUPs estimate_grouplevel(model, type = "total")
# lme4 model data(mtcars) model <- lme4::lmer(mpg ~ hp + (1 | carb), data = mtcars) random <- estimate_grouplevel(model) random # Visualize random effects plot(random) # Show group-specific effects estimate_grouplevel(model, deviation = FALSE) # Reshape to wide data so that it matches the original dataframe... reshaped <- reshape_grouplevel(random, indices = c("Coefficient", "SE")) # ... and can be easily combined alldata <- cbind(mtcars, reshaped) # Use summary() to remove duplicated rows summary(reshaped) # Compute BLUPs estimate_grouplevel(model, type = "total")
Estimate average value of response variable at each factor level. For
plotting, check the examples in visualisation_recipe()
. See also
other related functions such as estimate_contrasts()
and
estimate_slopes()
.
estimate_means( model, by = "auto", predict = NULL, ci = 0.95, marginalize = "average", backend = getOption("modelbased_backend", "emmeans"), transform = NULL, verbose = TRUE, ... )
estimate_means( model, by = "auto", predict = NULL, ci = 0.95, marginalize = "average", backend = getOption("modelbased_backend", "emmeans"), transform = NULL, verbose = TRUE, ... )
model |
A statistical model. |
by |
The (focal) predictor variable(s) at which to evaluate the desired
effect / mean / contrasts. Other predictors of the model that are not
included here will be collapsed and "averaged" over (the effect will be
estimated across them). |
predict |
Is passed to the
|
ci |
Confidence Interval (CI) level. Default to |
marginalize |
Character string, indicating the type of marginalization.
This dictates how the predictions are "averaged" over the non-focal predictors,
i.e. those variables that are not specified in
In other words, the distinction between marginalization types resides in whether the prediction are made for:
|
backend |
Whether to use You can set a default backend via |
transform |
Deprecated, please use |
verbose |
Use |
... |
Other arguments passed, for instance, to
|
The estimate_slopes()
, estimate_means()
and estimate_contrasts()
functions are forming a group, as they are all based on marginal
estimations (estimations based on a model). All three are built on the
emmeans or marginaleffects package (depending on the backend
argument), so reading its documentation (for instance emmeans::emmeans()
,
emmeans::emtrends()
or this website) is
recommended to understand the idea behind these types of procedures.
Model-based predictions is the basis for all that follows. Indeed,
the first thing to understand is how models can be used to make predictions
(see estimate_link()
). This corresponds to the predicted response (or
"outcome variable") given specific predictor values of the predictors (i.e.,
given a specific data configuration). This is why the concept of reference grid()
is so important for direct predictions.
Marginal "means", obtained via estimate_means()
, are an extension
of such predictions, allowing to "average" (collapse) some of the predictors,
to obtain the average response value at a specific predictors configuration.
This is typically used when some of the predictors of interest are factors.
Indeed, the parameters of the model will usually give you the intercept value
and then the "effect" of each factor level (how different it is from the
intercept). Marginal means can be used to directly give you the mean value of
the response variable at all the levels of a factor. Moreover, it can also be
used to control, or average over predictors, which is useful in the case of
multiple predictors with or without interactions.
Marginal contrasts, obtained via estimate_contrasts()
, are
themselves at extension of marginal means, in that they allow to investigate
the difference (i.e., the contrast) between the marginal means. This is,
again, often used to get all pairwise differences between all levels of a
factor. It works also for continuous predictors, for instance one could also
be interested in whether the difference at two extremes of a continuous
predictor is significant.
Finally, marginal effects, obtained via estimate_slopes()
, are
different in that their focus is not values on the response variable, but the
model's parameters. The idea is to assess the effect of a predictor at a
specific configuration of the other predictors. This is relevant in the case
of interactions or non-linear relationships, when the effect of a predictor
variable changes depending on the other predictors. Moreover, these effects
can also be "averaged" over other predictors, to get for instance the
"general trend" of a predictor over different factor levels.
Example: Let's imagine the following model lm(y ~ condition * x)
where
condition
is a factor with 3 levels A, B and C and x
a continuous
variable (like age for example). One idea is to see how this model performs,
and compare the actual response y to the one predicted by the model (using
estimate_expectation()
). Another idea is evaluate the average mean at each of
the condition's levels (using estimate_means()
), which can be useful to
visualize them. Another possibility is to evaluate the difference between
these levels (using estimate_contrasts()
). Finally, one could also estimate
the effect of x averaged over all conditions, or instead within each
condition (using [estimate_slopes]
).
A data frame of estimated marginal means.
Heiss, A. (2022). Marginal and conditional effects for GLMMs with marginaleffects. Andrew Heiss. doi:10.59350/xwnfm-x1827
library(modelbased) # Frequentist models # ------------------- model <- lm(Petal.Length ~ Sepal.Width * Species, data = iris) estimate_means(model) estimate_means(model, by = c("Species", "Sepal.Width"), length = 2) estimate_means(model, by = "Species=c('versicolor', 'setosa')") estimate_means(model, by = "Sepal.Width=c(2, 4)") estimate_means(model, by = c("Species", "Sepal.Width=0")) estimate_means(model, by = "Sepal.Width", length = 5) estimate_means(model, by = "Sepal.Width=c(2, 4)") # Methods that can be applied to it: means <- estimate_means(model, by = c("Species", "Sepal.Width=0")) plot(means) # which runs visualisation_recipe() standardize(means) data <- iris data$Petal.Length_factor <- ifelse(data$Petal.Length < 4.2, "A", "B") model <- lme4::lmer( Petal.Length ~ Sepal.Width + Species + (1 | Petal.Length_factor), data = data ) estimate_means(model) estimate_means(model, by = "Sepal.Width", length = 3)
library(modelbased) # Frequentist models # ------------------- model <- lm(Petal.Length ~ Sepal.Width * Species, data = iris) estimate_means(model) estimate_means(model, by = c("Species", "Sepal.Width"), length = 2) estimate_means(model, by = "Species=c('versicolor', 'setosa')") estimate_means(model, by = "Sepal.Width=c(2, 4)") estimate_means(model, by = c("Species", "Sepal.Width=0")) estimate_means(model, by = "Sepal.Width", length = 5) estimate_means(model, by = "Sepal.Width=c(2, 4)") # Methods that can be applied to it: means <- estimate_means(model, by = c("Species", "Sepal.Width=0")) plot(means) # which runs visualisation_recipe() standardize(means) data <- iris data$Petal.Length_factor <- ifelse(data$Petal.Length < 4.2, "A", "B") model <- lme4::lmer( Petal.Length ~ Sepal.Width + Species + (1 | Petal.Length_factor), data = data ) estimate_means(model) estimate_means(model, by = "Sepal.Width", length = 3)
Estimate the slopes (i.e., the coefficient) of a predictor over or within different factor levels, or alongside a numeric variable. In other words, to assess the effect of a predictor at specific configurations data. It corresponds to the derivative and can be useful to understand where a predictor has a significant role when interactions or non-linear relationships are present.
Other related functions based on marginal estimations includes
estimate_contrasts()
and estimate_means()
.
See the Details section below, and don't forget to also check out the Vignettes and README examples for various examples, tutorials and use cases.
estimate_slopes( model, trend = NULL, by = NULL, ci = 0.95, backend = getOption("modelbased_backend", "emmeans"), verbose = TRUE, ... )
estimate_slopes( model, trend = NULL, by = NULL, ci = 0.95, backend = getOption("modelbased_backend", "emmeans"), verbose = TRUE, ... )
model |
A statistical model. |
trend |
A character indicating the name of the variable for which to compute the slopes. |
by |
The (focal) predictor variable(s) at which to evaluate the desired
effect / mean / contrasts. Other predictors of the model that are not
included here will be collapsed and "averaged" over (the effect will be
estimated across them). |
ci |
Confidence Interval (CI) level. Default to |
backend |
Whether to use You can set a default backend via |
verbose |
Use |
... |
Other arguments passed, for instance, to
|
The estimate_slopes()
, estimate_means()
and estimate_contrasts()
functions are forming a group, as they are all based on marginal
estimations (estimations based on a model). All three are built on the
emmeans or marginaleffects package (depending on the backend
argument), so reading its documentation (for instance emmeans::emmeans()
,
emmeans::emtrends()
or this website) is
recommended to understand the idea behind these types of procedures.
Model-based predictions is the basis for all that follows. Indeed,
the first thing to understand is how models can be used to make predictions
(see estimate_link()
). This corresponds to the predicted response (or
"outcome variable") given specific predictor values of the predictors (i.e.,
given a specific data configuration). This is why the concept of reference grid()
is so important for direct predictions.
Marginal "means", obtained via estimate_means()
, are an extension
of such predictions, allowing to "average" (collapse) some of the predictors,
to obtain the average response value at a specific predictors configuration.
This is typically used when some of the predictors of interest are factors.
Indeed, the parameters of the model will usually give you the intercept value
and then the "effect" of each factor level (how different it is from the
intercept). Marginal means can be used to directly give you the mean value of
the response variable at all the levels of a factor. Moreover, it can also be
used to control, or average over predictors, which is useful in the case of
multiple predictors with or without interactions.
Marginal contrasts, obtained via estimate_contrasts()
, are
themselves at extension of marginal means, in that they allow to investigate
the difference (i.e., the contrast) between the marginal means. This is,
again, often used to get all pairwise differences between all levels of a
factor. It works also for continuous predictors, for instance one could also
be interested in whether the difference at two extremes of a continuous
predictor is significant.
Finally, marginal effects, obtained via estimate_slopes()
, are
different in that their focus is not values on the response variable, but the
model's parameters. The idea is to assess the effect of a predictor at a
specific configuration of the other predictors. This is relevant in the case
of interactions or non-linear relationships, when the effect of a predictor
variable changes depending on the other predictors. Moreover, these effects
can also be "averaged" over other predictors, to get for instance the
"general trend" of a predictor over different factor levels.
Example: Let's imagine the following model lm(y ~ condition * x)
where
condition
is a factor with 3 levels A, B and C and x
a continuous
variable (like age for example). One idea is to see how this model performs,
and compare the actual response y to the one predicted by the model (using
estimate_expectation()
). Another idea is evaluate the average mean at each of
the condition's levels (using estimate_means()
), which can be useful to
visualize them. Another possibility is to evaluate the difference between
these levels (using estimate_contrasts()
). Finally, one could also estimate
the effect of x averaged over all conditions, or instead within each
condition (using [estimate_slopes]
).
A data.frame of class estimate_slopes
.
library(ggplot2) # Get an idea of the data ggplot(iris, aes(x = Petal.Length, y = Sepal.Width)) + geom_point(aes(color = Species)) + geom_smooth(color = "black", se = FALSE) + geom_smooth(aes(color = Species), linetype = "dotted", se = FALSE) + geom_smooth(aes(color = Species), method = "lm", se = FALSE) # Model it model <- lm(Sepal.Width ~ Species * Petal.Length, data = iris) # Compute the marginal effect of Petal.Length at each level of Species slopes <- estimate_slopes(model, trend = "Petal.Length", by = "Species") slopes # Plot it plot(slopes) standardize(slopes) model <- mgcv::gam(Sepal.Width ~ s(Petal.Length), data = iris) slopes <- estimate_slopes(model, by = "Petal.Length", length = 50) summary(slopes) plot(slopes) model <- mgcv::gam(Sepal.Width ~ s(Petal.Length, by = Species), data = iris) slopes <- estimate_slopes(model, trend = "Petal.Length", by = c("Petal.Length", "Species"), length = 20 ) summary(slopes) plot(slopes)
library(ggplot2) # Get an idea of the data ggplot(iris, aes(x = Petal.Length, y = Sepal.Width)) + geom_point(aes(color = Species)) + geom_smooth(color = "black", se = FALSE) + geom_smooth(aes(color = Species), linetype = "dotted", se = FALSE) + geom_smooth(aes(color = Species), method = "lm", se = FALSE) # Model it model <- lm(Sepal.Width ~ Species * Petal.Length, data = iris) # Compute the marginal effect of Petal.Length at each level of Species slopes <- estimate_slopes(model, trend = "Petal.Length", by = "Species") slopes # Plot it plot(slopes) standardize(slopes) model <- mgcv::gam(Sepal.Width ~ s(Petal.Length), data = iris) slopes <- estimate_slopes(model, by = "Petal.Length", length = 50) summary(slopes) plot(slopes) model <- mgcv::gam(Sepal.Width ~ s(Petal.Length, by = Species), data = iris) slopes <- estimate_slopes(model, trend = "Petal.Length", by = c("Petal.Length", "Species"), length = 20 ) summary(slopes) plot(slopes)
These functions are convenient wrappers around the emmeans
and the
marginaleffects
packages. They are mostly available for developers who want
to leverage a unified API for getting model-based estimates, and regular users
should use the estimate_*
set of functions.
The get_emmeans()
, get_emcontrasts()
and get_emtrends()
functions are
wrappers around emmeans::emmeans()
and emmeans::emtrends()
.
get_emcontrasts( model, contrast = NULL, by = NULL, predict = NULL, comparison = "pairwise", transform = NULL, verbose = TRUE, ... ) get_emmeans( model, by = "auto", predict = NULL, transform = NULL, verbose = TRUE, ... ) get_emtrends(model, trend = NULL, by = NULL, verbose = TRUE, ...) get_marginalcontrasts( model, contrast = NULL, by = NULL, predict = NULL, comparison = "pairwise", marginalize = "average", ci = 0.95, p_adjust = "none", verbose = TRUE, ... ) get_marginalmeans( model, by = "auto", predict = NULL, ci = 0.95, marginalize = "average", transform = NULL, verbose = TRUE, ... ) get_marginaltrends(model, trend = NULL, by = NULL, verbose = TRUE, ...)
get_emcontrasts( model, contrast = NULL, by = NULL, predict = NULL, comparison = "pairwise", transform = NULL, verbose = TRUE, ... ) get_emmeans( model, by = "auto", predict = NULL, transform = NULL, verbose = TRUE, ... ) get_emtrends(model, trend = NULL, by = NULL, verbose = TRUE, ...) get_marginalcontrasts( model, contrast = NULL, by = NULL, predict = NULL, comparison = "pairwise", marginalize = "average", ci = 0.95, p_adjust = "none", verbose = TRUE, ... ) get_marginalmeans( model, by = "auto", predict = NULL, ci = 0.95, marginalize = "average", transform = NULL, verbose = TRUE, ... ) get_marginaltrends(model, trend = NULL, by = NULL, verbose = TRUE, ...)
model |
A statistical model. |
contrast |
A character vector indicating the name of the variable(s) for which to compute the contrasts. |
by |
The (focal) predictor variable(s) at which to evaluate the desired
effect / mean / contrasts. Other predictors of the model that are not
included here will be collapsed and "averaged" over (the effect will be
estimated across them). |
predict |
Is passed to the
|
comparison |
Specify the type of contrasts or tests that should be carried out.
|
transform |
Deprecated, please use |
verbose |
Use |
... |
Other arguments passed, for instance, to
|
trend |
A character indicating the name of the variable for which to compute the slopes. |
marginalize |
Character string, indicating the type of marginalization.
This dictates how the predictions are "averaged" over the non-focal predictors,
i.e. those variables that are not specified in
In other words, the distinction between marginalization types resides in whether the prediction are made for:
|
ci |
Confidence Interval (CI) level. Default to |
p_adjust |
The p-values adjustment method for frequentist multiple
comparisons. Can be one of |
# Basic usage model <- lm(Sepal.Width ~ Species, data = iris) get_emcontrasts(model) # Dealing with interactions model <- lm(Sepal.Width ~ Species * Petal.Width, data = iris) # By default: selects first factor get_emcontrasts(model) # Can also run contrasts between points of numeric get_emcontrasts(model, contrast = "Petal.Width", length = 3) # Or both get_emcontrasts(model, contrast = c("Species", "Petal.Width"), length = 2) # Or with custom specifications estimate_contrasts(model, contrast = c("Species", "Petal.Width=c(1, 2)")) # Or modulate it get_emcontrasts(model, by = "Petal.Width", length = 4) model <- lm(Sepal.Length ~ Species + Petal.Width, data = iris) # By default, 'by' is set to "Species" get_emmeans(model) # Overall mean (close to 'mean(iris$Sepal.Length)') get_emmeans(model, by = NULL) # One can estimate marginal means at several values of a 'modulate' variable get_emmeans(model, by = "Petal.Width", length = 3) # Interactions model <- lm(Sepal.Width ~ Species * Petal.Length, data = iris) get_emmeans(model) get_emmeans(model, by = c("Species", "Petal.Length"), length = 2) get_emmeans(model, by = c("Species", "Petal.Length = c(1, 3, 5)"), length = 2) model <- lm(Sepal.Width ~ Species * Petal.Length, data = iris) get_emtrends(model) get_emtrends(model, by = "Species") get_emtrends(model, by = "Petal.Length") get_emtrends(model, by = c("Species", "Petal.Length")) model <- lm(Petal.Length ~ poly(Sepal.Width, 4), data = iris) get_emtrends(model) get_emtrends(model, by = "Sepal.Width") model <- lm(Sepal.Length ~ Species + Petal.Width, data = iris) # By default, 'by' is set to "Species" get_marginalmeans(model) # Overall mean (close to 'mean(iris$Sepal.Length)') get_marginalmeans(model, by = NULL) # One can estimate marginal means at several values of a 'modulate' variable get_marginalmeans(model, by = "Petal.Width", length = 3) # Interactions model <- lm(Sepal.Width ~ Species * Petal.Length, data = iris) get_marginalmeans(model) get_marginalmeans(model, by = c("Species", "Petal.Length"), length = 2) get_marginalmeans(model, by = c("Species", "Petal.Length = c(1, 3, 5)"), length = 2) model <- lm(Sepal.Width ~ Species * Petal.Length, data = iris) get_marginaltrends(model, trend = "Petal.Length", by = "Species") get_marginaltrends(model, trend = "Petal.Length", by = "Petal.Length") get_marginaltrends(model, trend = "Petal.Length", by = c("Species", "Petal.Length"))
# Basic usage model <- lm(Sepal.Width ~ Species, data = iris) get_emcontrasts(model) # Dealing with interactions model <- lm(Sepal.Width ~ Species * Petal.Width, data = iris) # By default: selects first factor get_emcontrasts(model) # Can also run contrasts between points of numeric get_emcontrasts(model, contrast = "Petal.Width", length = 3) # Or both get_emcontrasts(model, contrast = c("Species", "Petal.Width"), length = 2) # Or with custom specifications estimate_contrasts(model, contrast = c("Species", "Petal.Width=c(1, 2)")) # Or modulate it get_emcontrasts(model, by = "Petal.Width", length = 4) model <- lm(Sepal.Length ~ Species + Petal.Width, data = iris) # By default, 'by' is set to "Species" get_emmeans(model) # Overall mean (close to 'mean(iris$Sepal.Length)') get_emmeans(model, by = NULL) # One can estimate marginal means at several values of a 'modulate' variable get_emmeans(model, by = "Petal.Width", length = 3) # Interactions model <- lm(Sepal.Width ~ Species * Petal.Length, data = iris) get_emmeans(model) get_emmeans(model, by = c("Species", "Petal.Length"), length = 2) get_emmeans(model, by = c("Species", "Petal.Length = c(1, 3, 5)"), length = 2) model <- lm(Sepal.Width ~ Species * Petal.Length, data = iris) get_emtrends(model) get_emtrends(model, by = "Species") get_emtrends(model, by = "Petal.Length") get_emtrends(model, by = c("Species", "Petal.Length")) model <- lm(Petal.Length ~ poly(Sepal.Width, 4), data = iris) get_emtrends(model) get_emtrends(model, by = "Sepal.Width") model <- lm(Sepal.Length ~ Species + Petal.Width, data = iris) # By default, 'by' is set to "Species" get_marginalmeans(model) # Overall mean (close to 'mean(iris$Sepal.Length)') get_marginalmeans(model, by = NULL) # One can estimate marginal means at several values of a 'modulate' variable get_marginalmeans(model, by = "Petal.Width", length = 3) # Interactions model <- lm(Sepal.Width ~ Species * Petal.Length, data = iris) get_marginalmeans(model) get_marginalmeans(model, by = c("Species", "Petal.Length"), length = 2) get_marginalmeans(model, by = c("Species", "Petal.Length = c(1, 3, 5)"), length = 2) model <- lm(Sepal.Width ~ Species * Petal.Length, data = iris) get_marginaltrends(model, trend = "Petal.Length", by = "Species") get_marginaltrends(model, trend = "Petal.Length", by = "Petal.Length") get_marginaltrends(model, trend = "Petal.Length", by = c("Species", "Petal.Length"))
Smoothing a vector or a time series. For data.frames, the function will smooth all numeric variables stratified by factor levels (i.e., will smooth within each factor level combination).
smoothing(x, method = "loess", strength = 0.25, ...)
smoothing(x, method = "loess", strength = 0.25, ...)
x |
A numeric vector. |
method |
Can be "loess" (default) or "smooth". A loess smoothing can be slow. |
strength |
This argument only applies when |
... |
Arguments passed to or from other methods. |
A smoothed vector or data frame.
x <- sin(seq(0, 4 * pi, length.out = 100)) + rnorm(100, 0, 0.2) plot(x, type = "l") lines(smoothing(x, method = "smooth"), type = "l", col = "blue") lines(smoothing(x, method = "loess"), type = "l", col = "red") x <- sin(seq(0, 4 * pi, length.out = 10000)) + rnorm(10000, 0, 0.2) plot(x, type = "l") lines(smoothing(x, method = "smooth"), type = "l", col = "blue") lines(smoothing(x, method = "loess"), type = "l", col = "red")
x <- sin(seq(0, 4 * pi, length.out = 100)) + rnorm(100, 0, 0.2) plot(x, type = "l") lines(smoothing(x, method = "smooth"), type = "l", col = "blue") lines(smoothing(x, method = "loess"), type = "l", col = "red") x <- sin(seq(0, 4 * pi, length.out = 10000)) + rnorm(10000, 0, 0.2) plot(x, type = "l") lines(smoothing(x, method = "smooth"), type = "l", col = "blue") lines(smoothing(x, method = "loess"), type = "l", col = "red")
This function is an alias (another name) for the insight::get_datagrid()
function. Same arguments apply.
visualisation_matrix(x, ...) ## S3 method for class 'data.frame' visualisation_matrix( x, by = "all", factors = "reference", numerics = "mean", preserve_range = FALSE, reference = x, ... ) ## S3 method for class 'numeric' visualisation_matrix(x, ...) ## S3 method for class 'factor' visualisation_matrix(x, ...)
visualisation_matrix(x, ...) ## S3 method for class 'data.frame' visualisation_matrix( x, by = "all", factors = "reference", numerics = "mean", preserve_range = FALSE, reference = x, ... ) ## S3 method for class 'numeric' visualisation_matrix(x, ...) ## S3 method for class 'factor' visualisation_matrix(x, ...)
x |
An object from which to construct the reference grid. |
... |
Arguments passed to or from other methods (for instance, |
by |
Indicates the focal predictors (variables) for the reference grid
and at which values focal predictors should be represented. If not specified
otherwise, representative values for numeric variables or predictors are
evenly distributed from the minimum to the maximum, with a total number of
There is a special handling of assignments with brackets, i.e. values
defined inside
For factor variables, the value(s) inside the brackets should indicate
one or more factor levels, like The remaining variables not specified in |
factors |
Type of summary for factors. Can be |
numerics |
Type of summary for numeric values. Can be |
preserve_range |
In the case of combinations between numeric variables
and factors, setting |
reference |
The reference vector from which to compute the mean and SD.
Used when standardizing or unstandardizing the grid using |
Reference grid data frame.
# See `?insight::get_datagrid`
# See `?insight::get_datagrid`
Most 'modelbased' objects can be visualized using the plot()
function, which
internally calls the visualisation_recipe()
function. See the examples
below for more information and examples on how to create and customize plots.
## S3 method for class 'estimate_predicted' visualisation_recipe( x, show_data = FALSE, point = NULL, line = NULL, pointrange = NULL, ribbon = NULL, facet = NULL, grid = NULL, join_dots = TRUE, ... ) ## S3 method for class 'estimate_slopes' visualisation_recipe( x, line = NULL, pointrange = NULL, ribbon = NULL, facet = NULL, grid = NULL, ... ) ## S3 method for class 'estimate_grouplevel' visualisation_recipe( x, line = NULL, pointrange = NULL, ribbon = NULL, facet = NULL, grid = NULL, ... )
## S3 method for class 'estimate_predicted' visualisation_recipe( x, show_data = FALSE, point = NULL, line = NULL, pointrange = NULL, ribbon = NULL, facet = NULL, grid = NULL, join_dots = TRUE, ... ) ## S3 method for class 'estimate_slopes' visualisation_recipe( x, line = NULL, pointrange = NULL, ribbon = NULL, facet = NULL, grid = NULL, ... ) ## S3 method for class 'estimate_grouplevel' visualisation_recipe( x, line = NULL, pointrange = NULL, ribbon = NULL, facet = NULL, grid = NULL, ... )
x |
A modelbased object. |
show_data |
Display the "raw" data as a background to the model-based estimation. |
point , line , pointrange , ribbon , facet , grid
|
Additional aesthetics and parameters for the geoms (see customization example). |
join_dots |
Logical, if |
... |
Not used. |
The plotting works by mapping any predictors from the by
argument to the x-axis,
colors, alpha (transparency) and facets. Thus, the appearance of the plot depends
on the order of the variables that you specify in the by
argument. For instance,
the plots corresponding to estimate_relation(model, by=c("Species", "Sepal.Length"))
and estimate_relation(model, by=c("Sepal.Length", "Species"))
will look different.
The automated plotting is primarily meant for convenient visual checks, but
for publication-ready figures, we recommend re-creating the figures using the
ggplot2
package directly.
# ============================================== # estimate_relation, estimate_expectation, ... # ============================================== # Simple Model --------------- x <- estimate_relation(lm(mpg ~ wt, data = mtcars)) layers <- visualisation_recipe(x) layers plot(layers) # visualization_recipe() is called implicitly when you call plot() plot(estimate_relation(lm(mpg ~ qsec, data = mtcars))) # And can be used in a pipe workflow lm(mpg ~ qsec, data = mtcars) |> estimate_relation(ci = c(0.5, 0.8, 0.9)) |> plot() # Customize aesthetics ---------- plot(x, point = list(color = "red", alpha = 0.6, size = 3), line = list(color = "blue", size = 3), ribbon = list(fill = "green", alpha = 0.7) ) + theme_minimal() + labs(title = "Relationship between MPG and WT") # Customize raw data ------------- plot(x, point = list(geom = "density_2d_filled"), line = list(color = "white")) + scale_x_continuous(expand = c(0, 0)) + scale_y_continuous(expand = c(0, 0)) + theme(legend.position = "none") # Single predictors examples ----------- plot(estimate_relation(lm(Sepal.Length ~ Species, data = iris))) # 2-ways interaction ------------ # Numeric * numeric x <- estimate_relation(lm(mpg ~ wt * qsec, data = mtcars)) plot(x) # Numeric * factor x <- estimate_relation(lm(Sepal.Width ~ Sepal.Length * Species, data = iris)) plot(x) # ============================================== # estimate_means # ============================================== # Simple Model --------------- x <- estimate_means(lm(Sepal.Width ~ Species, data = iris), by = "Species") layers <- visualisation_recipe(x) layers plot(layers) # Customize aesthetics layers <- visualisation_recipe(x, point = list(width = 0.03, color = "red"), pointrange = list(size = 2, linewidth = 2), line = list(linetype = "dashed", color = "blue") ) plot(layers) # Two levels --------------- data <- mtcars data$cyl <- as.factor(data$cyl) model <- lm(mpg ~ cyl * wt, data = data) x <- estimate_means(model, by = c("cyl", "wt")) plot(x) # GLMs --------------------- data <- data.frame(vs = mtcars$vs, cyl = as.factor(mtcars$cyl)) x <- estimate_means(glm(vs ~ cyl, data = data, family = "binomial"), by = c("cyl")) plot(x) # ============================================== # estimate_slopes # ============================================== model <- lm(Sepal.Width ~ Species * Petal.Length, data = iris) x <- estimate_slopes(model, trend = "Petal.Length", by = "Species") layers <- visualisation_recipe(x) layers plot(layers) # Customize aesthetics and add horizontal line and theme layers <- visualisation_recipe(x, pointrange = list(size = 2, linewidth = 2)) plot(layers) + geom_hline(yintercept = 0, linetype = "dashed", color = "red") + theme_minimal() + labs(y = "Effect of Petal.Length", title = "Marginal Effects") model <- lm(Petal.Length ~ poly(Sepal.Width, 4), data = iris) x <- estimate_slopes(model, trend = "Sepal.Width", by = "Sepal.Width", length = 20) plot(visualisation_recipe(x)) model <- lm(Petal.Length ~ Species * poly(Sepal.Width, 3), data = iris) x <- estimate_slopes(model, trend = "Sepal.Width", by = c("Sepal.Width", "Species")) plot(visualisation_recipe(x)) # ============================================== # estimate_grouplevel # ============================================== data <- lme4::sleepstudy data <- rbind(data, data) data$Newfactor <- rep(c("A", "B", "C", "D")) # 1 random intercept model <- lme4::lmer(Reaction ~ Days + (1 | Subject), data = data) x <- estimate_grouplevel(model) layers <- visualisation_recipe(x) layers plot(layers) # 2 random intercepts model <- lme4::lmer(Reaction ~ Days + (1 | Subject) + (1 | Newfactor), data = data) x <- estimate_grouplevel(model) plot(x) + geom_hline(yintercept = 0, linetype = "dashed") + theme_minimal() # Note: we need to use hline instead of vline because the axes is flipped model <- lme4::lmer(Reaction ~ Days + (1 + Days | Subject) + (1 | Newfactor), data = data) x <- estimate_grouplevel(model) plot(x)
# ============================================== # estimate_relation, estimate_expectation, ... # ============================================== # Simple Model --------------- x <- estimate_relation(lm(mpg ~ wt, data = mtcars)) layers <- visualisation_recipe(x) layers plot(layers) # visualization_recipe() is called implicitly when you call plot() plot(estimate_relation(lm(mpg ~ qsec, data = mtcars))) # And can be used in a pipe workflow lm(mpg ~ qsec, data = mtcars) |> estimate_relation(ci = c(0.5, 0.8, 0.9)) |> plot() # Customize aesthetics ---------- plot(x, point = list(color = "red", alpha = 0.6, size = 3), line = list(color = "blue", size = 3), ribbon = list(fill = "green", alpha = 0.7) ) + theme_minimal() + labs(title = "Relationship between MPG and WT") # Customize raw data ------------- plot(x, point = list(geom = "density_2d_filled"), line = list(color = "white")) + scale_x_continuous(expand = c(0, 0)) + scale_y_continuous(expand = c(0, 0)) + theme(legend.position = "none") # Single predictors examples ----------- plot(estimate_relation(lm(Sepal.Length ~ Species, data = iris))) # 2-ways interaction ------------ # Numeric * numeric x <- estimate_relation(lm(mpg ~ wt * qsec, data = mtcars)) plot(x) # Numeric * factor x <- estimate_relation(lm(Sepal.Width ~ Sepal.Length * Species, data = iris)) plot(x) # ============================================== # estimate_means # ============================================== # Simple Model --------------- x <- estimate_means(lm(Sepal.Width ~ Species, data = iris), by = "Species") layers <- visualisation_recipe(x) layers plot(layers) # Customize aesthetics layers <- visualisation_recipe(x, point = list(width = 0.03, color = "red"), pointrange = list(size = 2, linewidth = 2), line = list(linetype = "dashed", color = "blue") ) plot(layers) # Two levels --------------- data <- mtcars data$cyl <- as.factor(data$cyl) model <- lm(mpg ~ cyl * wt, data = data) x <- estimate_means(model, by = c("cyl", "wt")) plot(x) # GLMs --------------------- data <- data.frame(vs = mtcars$vs, cyl = as.factor(mtcars$cyl)) x <- estimate_means(glm(vs ~ cyl, data = data, family = "binomial"), by = c("cyl")) plot(x) # ============================================== # estimate_slopes # ============================================== model <- lm(Sepal.Width ~ Species * Petal.Length, data = iris) x <- estimate_slopes(model, trend = "Petal.Length", by = "Species") layers <- visualisation_recipe(x) layers plot(layers) # Customize aesthetics and add horizontal line and theme layers <- visualisation_recipe(x, pointrange = list(size = 2, linewidth = 2)) plot(layers) + geom_hline(yintercept = 0, linetype = "dashed", color = "red") + theme_minimal() + labs(y = "Effect of Petal.Length", title = "Marginal Effects") model <- lm(Petal.Length ~ poly(Sepal.Width, 4), data = iris) x <- estimate_slopes(model, trend = "Sepal.Width", by = "Sepal.Width", length = 20) plot(visualisation_recipe(x)) model <- lm(Petal.Length ~ Species * poly(Sepal.Width, 3), data = iris) x <- estimate_slopes(model, trend = "Sepal.Width", by = c("Sepal.Width", "Species")) plot(visualisation_recipe(x)) # ============================================== # estimate_grouplevel # ============================================== data <- lme4::sleepstudy data <- rbind(data, data) data$Newfactor <- rep(c("A", "B", "C", "D")) # 1 random intercept model <- lme4::lmer(Reaction ~ Days + (1 | Subject), data = data) x <- estimate_grouplevel(model) layers <- visualisation_recipe(x) layers plot(layers) # 2 random intercepts model <- lme4::lmer(Reaction ~ Days + (1 | Subject) + (1 | Newfactor), data = data) x <- estimate_grouplevel(model) plot(x) + geom_hline(yintercept = 0, linetype = "dashed") + theme_minimal() # Note: we need to use hline instead of vline because the axes is flipped model <- lme4::lmer(Reaction ~ Days + (1 + Days | Subject) + (1 | Newfactor), data = data) x <- estimate_grouplevel(model) plot(x)
Find zero crossings of a vector, i.e., indices when the numeric variable crosses 0. It is useful for finding the points where a function changes by looking at the zero crossings of its derivative.
zero_crossings(x) find_inversions(x)
zero_crossings(x) find_inversions(x)
x |
A numeric vector. |
Vector of zero crossings or points of inversion.
Based on the uniroot.all
function from the rootSolve package.
x <- sin(seq(0, 4 * pi, length.out = 100)) plot(x, type = "b") zero_crossings(x) find_inversions(x)
x <- sin(seq(0, 4 * pi, length.out = 100)) plot(x, type = "b") zero_crossings(x) find_inversions(x)